Tines
FreeIntelligent workflow automation and security platform for AI agents and apps.
Tines vs Make
Objective factual benchmark between two leading platforms to identify optimal fit based on scale and architecture.
Make
FreemiumVisual automation and integration platform to build workflows and AI agents.
Technical Verdict & Decision Factors
Tines and Make approach workflow automation differently. Tines prioritizes security, corporate governance, and complex API integration for IT and security teams. Make offers a visual scenario-based approach with over 3500 native connectors and an operation-based consumption pricing model.
Scale-ups & Agile Teams
Choose Tines if
Ideal for security and IT operations teams requiring stable workflows, strict traceability, and centralized access control without connector limits.
Get started with Tines (opens in a new tab)Enterprise & Compliance
Choose Make if
Suitable for technical and operations teams needing to quickly connect multiple SaaS applications using a visual designer and custom code execution.
Get started with Make (opens in a new tab)Key Differentiators
- Seat-based licensing model in Tines versus operation-based consumption in Make.
- Native ecosystem of over 3500 apps in Make versus universal API flexibility in Tines.
- Advanced governance and regulatory compliance controls targeting SOC2 and ISO in Tines.
Tines9.1/10
Make7.0/10
Tines8.9/10
Make7.8/10
Tines8.2/10
Make3.8/10
Side-by-Side Feature Comparison
| Datasheet | TinesFree | MakeFreemium |
|---|
Commercial Model & Pricing
| Base Price | Free | Free Tier |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | Free | Freemium |
| Score | ||
| Verified | VerifiedVerified tool: Audited technical attributes | VerifiedVerified tool: Audited technical attributes |
Core Features Matrix
| Specific Capabilities for Workflow Automation & Backend Orchestration | ||
|---|---|---|
| Stateful Durable Execution | Not available | Not available |
| Dead Letter Queue (DLQ) & Replay | Not available | Not available |
| TypeScript / Python Code Steps | Not available | Not available |
| Enterprise Architecture & Security (7 Universals) | ||
| REST & GraphQL API | Compatible | Compatible |
| SSO / SAML Authentication | Compatible | Compatible |
| Self-Hosted Option | Not available | Not available |
| Full Data Export | Compatible | Compatible |
| Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) | Compatible | Compatible |
| Custom Domains & SSL | Compatible | Not available |
| Immutable Audit Logs | Compatible | Compatible |
Architecture & Verified Specs
| Compliance & Data Sovereignty | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audited Certifications | ||
| SSO (SAML) Availability | Enterprise plan only | Enterprise plan only |
| Legal Headquarters & Jurisdiction | US | US |
| Subject to US CLOUD Act | Subject (US Extraterritorial) | Subject (US Extraterritorial) |
| Data Residency | US, EU | US, EU |
| Visit Website | Try Tines (opens in a new tab) | Try Make (opens in a new tab) |
|---|
Last technical review:
Technical Scorecard ComparisonShow detailsHide details
Technical Scorecard Comparison
Technical Scorecard Comparison: Tines vs Make
Tines88/100
Make85/100
DX & Tech Documentation
Pricing Fairness+5 pts Tines
Security & Governance+7 pts Tines
Data Portability & Sovereignty+4 pts Tines
Performance & Reliability+1 pts Make
Time to Value & Fit by Segment: Tines vs Make
Tines
Time-to-Value:< 1 hour (Immediate)
Curve:Moderate (Standard)
Near-instantaneous deployment with minimal technical friction.
Make
Time-to-Value:< 1 hour (Immediate)
Curve:Moderate (Standard)
Near-instantaneous deployment with minimal technical friction.
Segment Fit Comparison
Pricing & Licensing BreakdownShow detailsHide details
Pricing & Licensing Breakdown
Billing Clauses & SSO Tax: Tines vs Make
Tines
Enterprise-Only SSO
SAML/SSO locked strictly behind the highest custom corporate tier.
Free:Usuarios, espacios y conectores ilimitados con asignación de IA inicial.
- Consumo de IA y llamadas avanzadas pueden requerir actualización de plan al superar los límites gratuitos.
Make
Enterprise-Only SSO
SAML/SSO locked strictly behind the highest custom corporate tier.
Free:Includes a permanent free tier with a monthly operation allowance and basic scenario capacity.
- Operation limits can be exhausted quickly if loops or high-frequency polling triggers are misconfigured.
TCO & Savings CalculatorTCO 1-3YShow detailsHide details
TCO & Savings CalculatorTCO 1-3Y
Usage Billing PredictabilityWhat usage costs as you scaleShow detailsHide details
Usage Billing PredictabilityWhat usage costs as you scale
Bidirectional Migration Friction Index (MFI)Show detailsHide details
Bidirectional Migration Friction Index (MFI)
Bidirectional Migration Friction Index (MFI)
Migration friction: Tines to Make
0/100
Agile transition with low operational risk and native export/API support.
Critical Factors Evaluated
Smooth path: native export support, ingestion API, and authentication parity.
Migration friction: Make to Tines
0/100
Agile transition with low operational risk and native export/API support.
Critical Factors Evaluated
Smooth path: native export support, ingestion API, and authentication parity.
Technical Transition Playbook: Tines to MakeCLI Runbook4-stage execution protocol to switch dependencies with zero data loss and verifiable rollback.Show detailsHide details
Technical Transition Playbook: Tines to MakeCLI Runbook
4-stage execution protocol to switch dependencies with zero data loss and verifiable rollback.Community Sentiment & Commercial TermsShow detailsHide details
Community Sentiment & Commercial Terms
Technical Reputation of Tines
85/100 Technical Trust
Frequent Praises in Production
- Enables automation of complex workflows integrating multiple APIs and AI agents.
- Provides precise security controls and centralized visibility for IT teams.
- Includes a free edition with unlimited users, spaces, and connectors.
Reported Production Frictions
- Learning curve can be moderate for users without technical API experience.
- Advanced enterprise governance features require higher paid tiers.
Technical Reputation of Make
83/100 Technical Trust
Frequent Praises in Production
- Advanced visual scenario builder with support for custom JavaScript and Python code.
- Extensive ecosystem featuring over 3,500 pre-built integrations and universal API connectors.
- Permanent free tier available for experimentation and initial prototyping.
Reported Production Frictions
- Consumption is based on operations, which can unexpectedly increase costs in high-volume workflows.
- Advanced governance features and SSO are restricted to higher enterprise pricing tiers.
Frequently Asked Questions: Tines vs Make
What are the key differences between Tines and Make?
Tines and Make approach workflow automation differently. Tines prioritizes security, corporate governance, and complex API integration for IT and security teams. Make offers a visual scenario-based approach with over 3500 native connectors and an operation-based consumption pricing model.
How do Tines and Make pricing compare?
Tines starts at 0.00/mo under free tier, while Make starts at 0.00/mo with freemium billing.
When should you choose Tines over Make?
If your priority is Intelligent workflow automation and security platform for AI agents and apps., Tines is the optimal choice; for Visual automation and integration platform to build workflows and AI agents., Make provides superior benefits.