---
canonical: https://thejudex.com/vs/tines-vs-make
title: Tines vs Make
type: SoftwareComparison
updatedAt: 2026-10-28T13:59:29.709Z
---

# Technical Comparison: Tines vs Make

> Tines and Make approach workflow automation differently. Tines prioritizes security, corporate governance, and complex API integration for IT and security teams. Make offers a visual scenario-based approach with over 3500 native connectors and an operation-based consumption pricing model.

## Capabilities and Pricing Summary

| Dimension | Tines | Make |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Pricing Model | FREE | FREEMIUM |
| Starting Price | Free | Free / Contact vendor |
| Technical Rating | 4.5/5.0 | 4.4/5.0 |
| Verification | Verified | Verified |
| Markdown Card | [Tines.md](https://thejudex.com/tool/tines.md) | [Make.md](https://thejudex.com/tool/make.md) |

## Key Differentiators

- Seat-based licensing model in Tines versus operation-based consumption in Make.
- Native ecosystem of over 3500 apps in Make versus universal API flexibility in Tines.
- Advanced governance and regulatory compliance controls targeting SOC2 and ISO in Tines.

## Switching Cost and Bidirectional Migration Friction (MFI)

| Migration Route | MFI Index (0-100) | Rating | Audited Critical Factors |
| :--- | :---: | :--- | :--- |
| From Tines to Make | 70/100 | Alto Lock-in | Tines carece de exportación masiva nativa de datos documentada, lo que incrementa el riesgo de vendor lock-in.; Make no expone API pública para sincronización automatizada, requiriendo importaciones manuales. |
| From Make to Tines | 70/100 | Alto Lock-in | Make carece de exportación masiva nativa de datos documentada, lo que incrementa el riesgo de vendor lock-in.; Tines no expone API pública para sincronización automatizada, requiriendo importaciones manuales. |

> MFI Verdict: La fricción de migración es simétrica (70/100 en ambas direcciones). Ambas plataformas exhiben barreras de cambio comparables en términos de exportación, APIs públicas y continuidad de credenciales.

## Technical Feature Matrix

| Feature | Tines | Make |
| :--- | :---: | :---: |
| REST & GraphQL API | Yes | Yes |
| SSO / SAML Authentication | Yes | Yes |
| Self-Hosted Option | No | No |
| Full Data Export | Yes | Yes |
| Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) | Yes | Yes |
| Custom Domains & SSL | Yes | No |
| Immutable Audit Logs | Yes | Yes |

## Frequently Asked Questions

### Q: What is the main difference between Tines and Make?
A: Tines and Make approach workflow automation differently. Tines prioritizes security, corporate governance, and complex API integration for IT and security teams. Make offers a visual scenario-based approach with over 3500 native connectors and an operation-based consumption pricing model.

### Q: Which is more affordable, Tines or Make?
A: Tines has a starting price of Free, while Make starts from Free / Contact vendor.

## Canonical Resources

- Web Comparison: https://thejudex.com/vs/tines-vs-make
- AEO Markdown Format: https://thejudex.com/vs/tines-vs-make.md
- Profile of Tines: https://thejudex.com/tool/tines
- Profile of Make: https://thejudex.com/tool/make