Activepieces
FreemiumOpen-source workflow automation and AI agent platform.
Activepieces vs Make
Objective factual benchmark between two leading platforms to identify optimal fit based on scale and architecture.
Make
FreemiumVisual automation and integration platform to build workflows and AI agents.
Technical Verdict & Decision Factors
Activepieces provides an open-source architecture geared towards self-hosting and full data control, whereas Make operates as a proprietary SaaS platform with an advanced visual builder and over 3500 prebuilt integrations.
Scale-ups & Agile Teams
Choose Activepieces if
Ideal for engineering teams requiring data sovereignty, on-premise deployment, and strict audit control under an open-source model.
Get started with Activepieces (opens in a new tab)Enterprise & Compliance
Choose Make if
Optimal for organizations prioritizing a fully managed SaaS solution with a massive catalog of connectors and zero infrastructure maintenance overhead.
Get started with Make (opens in a new tab)Key Differentiators
- Deployment model: Full open-source self-hosting in Activepieces versus managed SaaS infrastructure in Make.
- Connector ecosystem: Over 770 integrations in Activepieces compared to over 3500 connectors in Make.
- Custom code execution: Native AI agents and tool support versus JavaScript and Python execution in Make scenarios.
Activepieces7.0/10
Make7.0/10
Activepieces7.9/10
Make7.8/10
Activepieces4.9/10
Make3.8/10
Side-by-Side Feature Comparison
| Datasheet | ActivepiecesFreemium | MakeFreemium |
|---|
Commercial Model & Pricing
| Base Price | Free Tier | Free Tier |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Score | ||
| Verified | VerifiedVerified tool: Audited technical attributes | VerifiedVerified tool: Audited technical attributes |
Core Features Matrix
| Specific Capabilities for Workflow Automation & Backend Orchestration | ||
|---|---|---|
| Stateful Durable Execution | Not available | Not available |
| Dead Letter Queue (DLQ) & Replay | Not available | Not available |
| TypeScript / Python Code Steps | Not available | Not available |
| Enterprise Architecture & Security (7 Universals) | ||
| REST & GraphQL API | Compatible | Compatible |
| SSO / SAML Authentication | Compatible | Compatible |
| Self-Hosted Option | Compatible | Not available |
| Full Data Export | Compatible | Compatible |
| Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) | Compatible | Compatible |
| Custom Domains & SSL | Compatible | Not available |
| Immutable Audit Logs | Compatible | Compatible |
Architecture & Verified Specs
| Compliance & Data Sovereignty | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audited Certifications | ||
| SSO (SAML) Availability | Enterprise plan only | Enterprise plan only |
| Legal Headquarters & Jurisdiction | US | US |
| Subject to US CLOUD Act | Subject (US Extraterritorial) | Subject (US Extraterritorial) |
| Data Residency | US, EU, SELF_HOSTED | US, EU |
| Open Source Telemetry & Code Sovereignty | ||
| GitHub Stars | 25.3k | Proprietary / Closed Source |
| Latest Commit / Vitality | Nov 2, 2026 | Proprietary / Closed Source |
| SPDX License | Other | Proprietary / Closed Source |
| Primary Language | TypeScript | Cloud / SaaS |
| Minimum RAM Required | Cloud Managed | Cloud Managed |
| Visit Website | Try Activepieces (opens in a new tab) | Try Make (opens in a new tab) |
|---|
Last technical review:
Technical Scorecard ComparisonShow detailsHide details
Technical Scorecard Comparison
Technical Scorecard Comparison: Activepieces vs Make
Activepieces86/100
Make85/100
DX & Tech Documentation
Pricing Fairness+5 pts Activepieces
Security & Governance+3 pts Make
Data Portability & Sovereignty+8 pts Activepieces
Performance & Reliability+5 pts Make
Time to Value & Fit by Segment: Activepieces vs Make
Activepieces
Time-to-Value:< 1 hour (Immediate)
Curve:Moderate (Standard)
Near-instantaneous deployment with minimal technical friction.
Make
Time-to-Value:< 1 hour (Immediate)
Curve:Moderate (Standard)
Near-instantaneous deployment with minimal technical friction.
Segment Fit Comparison
Pricing & Licensing BreakdownShow detailsHide details
Pricing & Licensing Breakdown
Billing Clauses & SSO Tax: Activepieces vs Make
Activepieces
Enterprise-Only SSO
SAML/SSO locked strictly behind the highest custom corporate tier.
Free:Includes access to community editions and self-hosting with basic workflow allowances.
- Task execution limits can scale quickly with high-frequency workflows.
- Advanced governance features may require enterprise tier commitments.
Make
Enterprise-Only SSO
SAML/SSO locked strictly behind the highest custom corporate tier.
Free:Includes a permanent free tier with a monthly operation allowance and basic scenario capacity.
- Operation limits can be exhausted quickly if loops or high-frequency polling triggers are misconfigured.
TCO & Savings CalculatorTCO 1-3YShow detailsHide details
TCO & Savings CalculatorTCO 1-3Y
Usage Billing PredictabilityWhat usage costs as you scaleShow detailsHide details
Usage Billing PredictabilityWhat usage costs as you scale
Bidirectional Migration Friction Index (MFI)Show detailsHide details
Bidirectional Migration Friction Index (MFI)
Bidirectional Migration Friction Index (MFI)
Migration friction: Activepieces to Make
0/100
Agile transition with low operational risk and native export/API support.
Critical Factors Evaluated
Smooth path: native export support, ingestion API, and authentication parity.
Migration friction: Make to Activepieces
0/100
Agile transition with low operational risk and native export/API support.
Critical Factors Evaluated
Smooth path: native export support, ingestion API, and authentication parity.
Technical Transition Playbook: Activepieces to MakeCLI Runbook4-stage execution protocol to switch dependencies with zero data loss and verifiable rollback.Show detailsHide details
Technical Transition Playbook: Activepieces to MakeCLI Runbook
4-stage execution protocol to switch dependencies with zero data loss and verifiable rollback.Community Sentiment & Commercial TermsShow detailsHide details
Community Sentiment & Commercial Terms
Technical Reputation of Activepieces
87/100 Technical Trust
Frequent Praises in Production
- Open-source model with self-hosting options on private infrastructure.
- Extensive ecosystem of over 770 pre-built connectors for business applications.
- Native support for creating and orchestrating artificial intelligence agents.
Reported Production Frictions
- Moderate learning curve for advanced agent configuration and complex flows.
- Execution and consumption limits on cloud-hosted subscription tiers.
Technical Reputation of Make
83/100 Technical Trust
Frequent Praises in Production
- Advanced visual scenario builder with support for custom JavaScript and Python code.
- Extensive ecosystem featuring over 3,500 pre-built integrations and universal API connectors.
- Permanent free tier available for experimentation and initial prototyping.
Reported Production Frictions
- Consumption is based on operations, which can unexpectedly increase costs in high-volume workflows.
- Advanced governance features and SSO are restricted to higher enterprise pricing tiers.
Frequently Asked Questions: Activepieces vs Make
What are the key differences between Activepieces and Make?
Activepieces provides an open-source architecture geared towards self-hosting and full data control, whereas Make operates as a proprietary SaaS platform with an advanced visual builder and over 3500 prebuilt integrations.
How do Activepieces and Make pricing compare?
Activepieces starts at 0.00/mo under freemium tier, while Make starts at 0.00/mo with freemium billing.
When should you choose Activepieces over Make?
If your priority is Open-source workflow automation and AI agent platform., Activepieces is the optimal choice; for Visual automation and integration platform to build workflows and AI agents., Make provides superior benefits.