---
canonical: https://thejudex.com/vs/activepieces-vs-make
title: Activepieces vs Make
type: SoftwareComparison
updatedAt: 2026-10-27T16:06:06.582Z
---

# Technical Comparison: Activepieces vs Make

> Activepieces provides an open-source architecture geared towards self-hosting and full data control, whereas Make operates as a proprietary SaaS platform with an advanced visual builder and over 3500 prebuilt integrations.

## Capabilities and Pricing Summary

| Dimension | Activepieces | Make |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Pricing Model | FREEMIUM | FREEMIUM |
| Starting Price | Free / Contact vendor | Free / Contact vendor |
| Technical Rating | 4.4/5.0 | 4.4/5.0 |
| Verification | Verified | Verified |
| Markdown Card | [Activepieces.md](https://thejudex.com/tool/activepieces.md) | [Make.md](https://thejudex.com/tool/make.md) |

## Key Differentiators

- Deployment model: Full open-source self-hosting in Activepieces versus managed SaaS infrastructure in Make.
- Connector ecosystem: Over 770 integrations in Activepieces compared to over 3500 connectors in Make.
- Custom code execution: Native AI agents and tool support versus JavaScript and Python execution in Make scenarios.

## Switching Cost and Bidirectional Migration Friction (MFI)

| Migration Route | MFI Index (0-100) | Rating | Audited Critical Factors |
| :--- | :---: | :--- | :--- |
| From Activepieces to Make | 70/100 | Alto Lock-in | Activepieces carece de exportación masiva nativa de datos documentada, lo que incrementa el riesgo de vendor lock-in.; Make no expone API pública para sincronización automatizada, requiriendo importaciones manuales. |
| From Make to Activepieces | 70/100 | Alto Lock-in | Make carece de exportación masiva nativa de datos documentada, lo que incrementa el riesgo de vendor lock-in.; Activepieces no expone API pública para sincronización automatizada, requiriendo importaciones manuales. |

> MFI Verdict: La fricción de migración es simétrica (70/100 en ambas direcciones). Ambas plataformas exhiben barreras de cambio comparables en términos de exportación, APIs públicas y continuidad de credenciales.

## Technical Feature Matrix

| Feature | Activepieces | Make |
| :--- | :---: | :---: |
| REST & GraphQL API | Yes | Yes |
| SSO / SAML Authentication | Yes | Yes |
| Self-Hosted Option | Yes | No |
| Full Data Export | Yes | Yes |
| Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) | Yes | Yes |
| Custom Domains & SSL | Yes | No |
| Immutable Audit Logs | Yes | Yes |

## Frequently Asked Questions

### Q: What is the main difference between Activepieces and Make?
A: Activepieces provides an open-source architecture geared towards self-hosting and full data control, whereas Make operates as a proprietary SaaS platform with an advanced visual builder and over 3500 prebuilt integrations.

### Q: Which is more affordable, Activepieces or Make?
A: Activepieces has a starting price of Free / Contact vendor, while Make starts from Free / Contact vendor.

## Canonical Resources

- Web Comparison: https://thejudex.com/vs/activepieces-vs-make
- AEO Markdown Format: https://thejudex.com/vs/activepieces-vs-make.md
- Profile of Activepieces: https://thejudex.com/tool/activepieces
- Profile of Make: https://thejudex.com/tool/make