Make
FreemiumVisual automation and integration platform to build workflows and AI agents.
Make vs Make
Objective factual benchmark between two leading platforms to identify optimal fit based on scale and architecture.
Make
FreemiumVisual platform for no-code workflow automation and orchestration.
Technical Verdict & Decision Factors
Both entries refer to the same SaaS orchestration infrastructure, evolving from Integromat to Make, emphasizing the integration of AI and autonomous agents. Structurally, they operate as a visual iPaaS model based on operation consumption, prioritizing complex logic design over traditional coding. There are no fundamental architectural differences as the underlying entity remains unified.
Scale-ups & Agile Teams
Choose Make if
Operations teams needing to integrate AI agents and LLM-based workflows with low deployment friction.
Get started with Make (opens in a new tab)Enterprise & Compliance
Choose Make if
Technical teams focused on legacy Integromat process migration and orchestrating complex systems requiring high auditability.
Get started with Make (opens in a new tab)Key Differentiators
- Pricing model based strictly on executed operations and data consumption
- Native capability for designing scenarios with logical branching and advanced error handling
- Comprehensive support for AI connectors and natural language agents on the visual canvas
- Centralized iPaaS architecture with SOC2 Type 2 compliance and EU/US data sovereignty
Make7.0/10
Make7.0/10
Make7.8/10
Make7.8/10
Make3.8/10
Make3.8/10
Side-by-Side Feature Comparison
| Datasheet | MakeFreemium | MakeFreemium |
|---|
Commercial Model & Pricing
| Base Price | Free Tier | Free Tier |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Score | ||
| Verified | VerifiedVerified tool: Audited technical attributes | VerifiedVerified tool: Audited technical attributes |
Core Features Matrix
| Specific Capabilities for Workflow Automation & Backend Orchestration | ||
|---|---|---|
| Stateful Durable Execution | Not available | Not available |
| Dead Letter Queue (DLQ) & Replay | Not available | Not available |
| TypeScript / Python Code Steps | Not available | Not available |
| Enterprise Architecture & Security (7 Universals) | ||
| REST & GraphQL API | Compatible | Compatible |
| SSO / SAML Authentication | Compatible | Compatible |
| Self-Hosted Option | Not available | Not available |
| Full Data Export | Compatible | Compatible |
| Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) | Compatible | Compatible |
| Custom Domains & SSL | Not available | Not available |
| Immutable Audit Logs | Compatible | Compatible |
Architecture & Verified Specs
| Compliance & Data Sovereignty | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audited Certifications | ||
| SSO (SAML) Availability | Enterprise plan only | Enterprise plan only |
| Legal Headquarters & Jurisdiction | US | CZ |
| Subject to US CLOUD Act | Subject (US Extraterritorial) | Immune (EU Sovereignty) |
| Data Residency | US, EU | US, EU |
| Visit Website | Try Make (opens in a new tab) | Try Make (opens in a new tab) |
|---|
Last technical review:
Technical Scorecard ComparisonShow detailsHide details
Technical Scorecard Comparison
Technical Scorecard Comparison: Make vs Make
Make85/100
Make85/100
DX & Tech Documentation+2 pts Make
Pricing Fairness+2 pts Make
Security & Governance
Data Portability & Sovereignty
Performance & Reliability
Time to Value & Fit by Segment: Make vs Make
Make
Time-to-Value:< 1 hour (Immediate)
Curve:Moderate (Standard)
Near-instantaneous deployment with minimal technical friction.
Make
Time-to-Value:< 1 hour (Immediate)
Curve:Moderate (Standard)
Near-instantaneous deployment with minimal technical friction.
Segment Fit Comparison
Pricing & Licensing BreakdownShow detailsHide details
Pricing & Licensing Breakdown
Billing Clauses & SSO Tax: Make vs Make
Make
Enterprise-Only SSO
SAML/SSO locked strictly behind the highest custom corporate tier.
Free:Includes a permanent free tier with a monthly operation allowance and basic scenario capacity.
- Operation limits can be exhausted quickly if loops or high-frequency polling triggers are misconfigured.
Make
Enterprise-Only SSO
SAML/SSO locked strictly behind the highest custom corporate tier.
Free:Includes a limited monthly operations quota for testing and basic workflows.
- Operations count can increase exponentially with poorly optimized loops and iterations.
TCO & Savings CalculatorTCO 1-3YShow detailsHide details
TCO & Savings CalculatorTCO 1-3Y
Usage Billing PredictabilityWhat usage costs as you scaleShow detailsHide details
Usage Billing PredictabilityWhat usage costs as you scale
Bidirectional Migration Friction Index (MFI)Show detailsHide details
Bidirectional Migration Friction Index (MFI)
Bidirectional Migration Friction Index (MFI)
Migration friction: Make to Make
0/100
Agile transition with low operational risk and native export/API support.
Critical Factors Evaluated
Smooth path: native export support, ingestion API, and authentication parity.
Migration friction: Make to Make
0/100
Agile transition with low operational risk and native export/API support.
Critical Factors Evaluated
Smooth path: native export support, ingestion API, and authentication parity.
Technical Transition Playbook: Make to MakeCLI Runbook4-stage execution protocol to switch dependencies with zero data loss and verifiable rollback.Show detailsHide details
Technical Transition Playbook: Make to MakeCLI Runbook
4-stage execution protocol to switch dependencies with zero data loss and verifiable rollback.Community Sentiment & Commercial TermsShow detailsHide details
Community Sentiment & Commercial Terms
Technical Reputation of Make
83/100 Technical Trust
Frequent Praises in Production
- Advanced visual scenario builder with support for custom JavaScript and Python code.
- Extensive ecosystem featuring over 3,500 pre-built integrations and universal API connectors.
- Permanent free tier available for experimentation and initial prototyping.
Reported Production Frictions
- Consumption is based on operations, which can unexpectedly increase costs in high-volume workflows.
- Advanced governance features and SSO are restricted to higher enterprise pricing tiers.
Technical Reputation of Make
83/100 Technical Trust
Frequent Praises in Production
- Advanced error handling capabilities compared to similar tools
- Powerful visual canvas for complex and branching workflows
- Extensive connector ecosystem and support for custom API calls
Reported Production Frictions
- Moderately steep learning curve for non-technical users
- Operation consumption can scale quickly under high-traffic scenarios
Frequently Asked Questions: Make vs Make
What are the key differences between Make and Make?
Both entries refer to the same SaaS orchestration infrastructure, evolving from Integromat to Make, emphasizing the integration of AI and autonomous agents. Structurally, they operate as a visual iPaaS model based on operation consumption, prioritizing complex logic design over traditional coding. There are no fundamental architectural differences as the underlying entity remains unified.
How do Make and Make pricing compare?
Make starts at 0.00/mo under freemium tier, while Make starts at 0.00/mo with freemium billing.
When should you choose Make over Make?
If your priority is Visual automation and integration platform to build workflows and AI agents., Make is the optimal choice; for Visual platform for no-code workflow automation and orchestration., Make provides superior benefits.