Technical Verdict & Decision Factors

Tines focuses on security orchestration, strict governance, and AI agents for IT teams. Make prioritizes visual no-code integration of business apps and operation-based execution.

Scale-ups & Agile Teams

Choose Tines if

Ideal for security and IT operations teams requiring strict governance, identity control, and complex workflows with AI agents.

Get started with Tines (opens in a new tab)
Enterprise & Compliance

Choose Make if

Suitable for operations and development teams needing to connect multiple SaaS apps rapidly through a visual no-code canvas.

Get started with Make (opens in a new tab)

Key Differentiators

  • Seat-based licensing model in Tines versus operation-based consumption in Make.
  • Native focus on security and advanced compliance in Tines compared to Make's massive connector ecosystem.
Weights 40% DX, 40% Fair Pricing, 20% PerformanceRecommended winner for this scenario:Tines (9.1/10)
Tines9.1/10
Make7.0/10
Weights 45% Security & Governance, 35% Reliability, 20% DXRecommended winner for this scenario:Tines (8.9/10)
Tines8.9/10
Make7.8/10
Weights 55% Data Portability, 25% Fair Pricing, 20% SecurityRecommended winner for this scenario:Tines (8.2/10)
Tines8.2/10
Make3.8/10

Side-by-Side Feature Comparison

Tines vs Make
Datasheet
TinesFree
MakeFreemium
Commercial Model & Pricing
Base PriceFreeFree Tier
Pricing ModelFreeFreemium
Score4.5/5.0(1 review)4.4/5.0(1 review)
VerifiedVerifiedVerified tool: Audited technical attributesVerifiedVerified tool: Audited technical attributes
Core Features Matrix
Specific Capabilities for Workflow Automation & Backend Orchestration
Stateful Durable ExecutionNot availableNot available
Dead Letter Queue (DLQ) & ReplayNot availableNot available
TypeScript / Python Code StepsNot availableNot available
Enterprise Architecture & Security (7 Universals)
REST & GraphQL APICompatibleCompatible
SSO / SAML AuthenticationCompatibleCompatible
Self-Hosted OptionNot availableNot available
Full Data ExportCompatibleCompatible
Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)CompatibleCompatible
Custom Domains & SSLCompatibleNot available
Immutable Audit LogsCompatibleCompatible
Architecture & Verified Specs
Compliance & Data Sovereignty
Audited Certifications
SOC2 TYPE2ISO 27001GDPR
SOC2 TYPE2GDPR
SSO (SAML) AvailabilityEnterprise plan onlyEnterprise plan only
Legal Headquarters & JurisdictionUSCZ
Subject to US CLOUD ActSubject (US Extraterritorial)Immune (EU Sovereignty)
Data ResidencyUS, EUUS, EU
Visit WebsiteTry Tines (opens in a new tab)Try Make (opens in a new tab)

Last technical review:

Technical Scorecard Comparison
Show detailsHide details

Technical Scorecard Comparison: Tines vs Make

Tines88/100
Make85/100
DX & Tech Documentation+2 pts Tines
Tines
90
Make
88
Pricing Fairness+3 pts Tines
Tines
85
Make
82
Security & Governance+7 pts Tines
Tines
92
Make
85
Data Portability & Sovereignty+4 pts Tines
Tines
84
Make
80
Performance & Reliability+1 pts Make
Tines
89
Make
90

Time to Value & Fit by Segment: Tines vs Make

Tines

Time-to-Value:< 1 hour (Immediate)
Curve:Moderate (Standard)

Near-instantaneous deployment with minimal technical friction.

Make

Time-to-Value:< 1 hour (Immediate)
Curve:Moderate (Standard)

Near-instantaneous deployment with minimal technical friction.

Segment Fit Comparison

Startup & Agile Teams1 to 50 members
Tines
80%
Make
90%
Mid-Market & Scaleup50 to 500 members
Tines
90%
Make
85%
Corporate Enterprise500+ members
Tines
85%
Make
75%
Pricing & Licensing Breakdown
Show detailsHide details

Billing Clauses & SSO Tax: Tines vs Make

Tines

Enterprise-Only SSO

SAML/SSO locked strictly behind the highest custom corporate tier.

Free:Usuarios, espacios y conectores ilimitados con asignación de IA inicial.
  • Consumo de IA y llamadas avanzadas pueden requerir actualización de plan al superar los límites gratuitos.

Make

Enterprise-Only SSO

SAML/SSO locked strictly behind the highest custom corporate tier.

Free:Includes a limited monthly operations quota for testing and basic workflows.
  • Operations count can increase exponentially with poorly optimized loops and iterations.
TCO & Savings CalculatorTCO 1-3Y
Show detailsHide details
Indie / Solo (1 active user)

Solo developer or independent technical founder.

Tines

Most Cost-Effective
Base Monthly Cost:$0/month
12-Month Investment:$0/year
36 Months (3 years):$0

Make

Base Monthly Cost:$12/month
12-Month Investment:$122/year
36 Months (3 years):$366
Estimated Financial Differential

Tines: $122 USD/year ($366 USD 36 Months (3 years)).

Startup (10 active users)

Agile engineering team in validation and early traction stage.

Tines

Most Cost-Effective
Base Monthly Cost:$0/month
12-Month Investment:$0/year
36 Months (3 years):$0

Make

Base Monthly Cost:$270/month
12-Month Investment:$2,754/year
36 Months (3 years):$8,262
Estimated Financial Differential

Tines: $2,754 USD/year ($8,262 USD 36 Months (3 years)).

Growth (25 active users)

Scaling company with team governance and granular access control requirements.

Tines

Most Cost-Effective
Base Monthly Cost:$0/month
12-Month Investment:$0/year
36 Months (3 years):$0

Make

Base Monthly Cost:$675/month
12-Month Investment:$6,885/year
36 Months (3 years):$20,655
Estimated Financial Differential

Tines: $6,885 USD/year ($20,655 USD 36 Months (3 years)).

Scaleup (100 active users)

Established organization with enterprise security policies and mandatory SAML/SSO.

Tines

Most Cost-Effective
Base Monthly Cost:$0/month
12-Month Investment:$0/year
36 Months (3 years):$0

Make

Base Monthly Cost:$2,700/month
12-Month Investment:$27,540/year
36 Months (3 years):$82,620
Estimated Financial Differential

Tines: $27,540 USD/year ($82,620 USD 36 Months (3 years)).

Usage Billing PredictabilityWhat usage costs as you scale
Show detailsHide details

Prototype / MVP (10 GB)

Comparative projection for Storage & Compute (GB)

Tines

Most Cost-Effective
Overage penalty:$0
Estimated Monthly Invoice:$0/mo
Low Risk

Make

Overage penalty:+$1/mo
Estimated Monthly Invoice:$21/mo
Low Risk

Base Production (50 GB)

Comparative projection for Storage & Compute (GB)

Tines

Most Cost-Effective
Overage penalty:$0
Estimated Monthly Invoice:$0/mo
Low Risk

Make

Overage penalty:+$8/mo
Estimated Monthly Invoice:$28/mo
Low Risk

Active Growth (250 GB)

Comparative projection for Storage & Compute (GB)

Tines

Most Cost-Effective
Overage penalty:$0
Estimated Monthly Invoice:$0/mo
Low Risk

Make

Overage penalty:+$44/mo
Estimated Monthly Invoice:$64/mo
High Risk

Large Scale (1.000 GB (1 TB))

Comparative projection for Storage & Compute (GB)

Tines

Most Cost-Effective
Overage penalty:$0
Estimated Monthly Invoice:$0/mo
Low Risk

Make

Overage penalty:+$179/mo
Estimated Monthly Invoice:$199/mo
Critical Risk
Bidirectional Migration Friction Index (MFI)
Show detailsHide details

Bidirectional Migration Friction Index (MFI)

TinesMake
Smooth Migration

Migration friction: Tines to Make

0/100

Agile transition with low operational risk and native export/API support.

Critical Factors Evaluated

Smooth path: native export support, ingestion API, and authentication parity.

MakeTines
Smooth Migration

Migration friction: Make to Tines

0/100

Agile transition with low operational risk and native export/API support.

Critical Factors Evaluated

Smooth path: native export support, ingestion API, and authentication parity.

Migration & Portability Verdict

Migration friction is symmetric (0/100 in both directions). Both platforms exhibit comparable switching barriers in terms of data export, public APIs, and credential continuity.

Technical Transition Playbook: Tines to MakeCLI Runbook
4-stage execution protocol to switch dependencies with zero data loss and verifiable rollback.
Show detailsHide details
01

Data Extraction & Baseline Snapshot

Full export of Tines datasets in audited formats (JSON). Secure an immutable snapshot prior to cutover.

GET /api/v1/stories
02

Schema Mapping & Contract Validation

Normalize entity identifiers, timestamps, and event payloads between Tines APIs and destination schema in Make.

# Schema mapping & validation
npx tsx scripts/map-migration.ts --source=tines --target=integromat
03

Dual-Ingestion Period (Dual-Writing)

Simultaneous telemetry dispatch to Tines and Make for 72 hours to contrast volume, integrity, and latency without downtime.

export TELEMETRY_PRIMARY="integromat"
export TELEMETRY_SECONDARY="tines"
04

Decommissioning & Rollback Safety

De-instrument Tines SDK, archive snapshot in cold S3 storage, and confirm zero ongoing billing.

# Check decommission
curl -I "https://tines.com/"

Architecture Decision Record for CTOs & Tech Leads

Production-ready technical document for Notion, Confluence, or Pull Requests

Select recommended tool:
Community Sentiment & Commercial Terms
Show detailsHide details

Technical Reputation of Tines

85/100 Technical Trust

Frequent Praises in Production

  • Enables automation of complex workflows integrating multiple APIs and AI agents.
  • Provides precise security controls and centralized visibility for IT teams.
  • Includes a free edition with unlimited users, spaces, and connectors.

Reported Production Frictions

  • Learning curve can be moderate for users without technical API experience.
  • Advanced enterprise governance features require higher paid tiers.
Commercial Treatment & Vendor Lock-in:Self-Service in Dashboard

Cancellation flow is autonomous via billing portal or subscription settings.

Technical Reputation of Make

83/100 Technical Trust

Frequent Praises in Production

  • Advanced error handling capabilities compared to similar tools
  • Powerful visual canvas for complex and branching workflows
  • Extensive connector ecosystem and support for custom API calls

Reported Production Frictions

  • Moderately steep learning curve for non-technical users
  • Operation consumption can scale quickly under high-traffic scenarios
Commercial Treatment & Vendor Lock-in:Requires Sales Contact

Assisted cancellation requiring meeting with account team or contract notice period.

Frequently Asked Questions: Tines vs Make

What are the key differences between Tines and Make?

Tines focuses on security orchestration, strict governance, and AI agents for IT teams. Make prioritizes visual no-code integration of business apps and operation-based execution.

How do Tines and Make pricing compare?

Tines starts at 0.00/mo under free tier, while Make starts at 0.00/mo with freemium billing.

When should you choose Tines over Make?

If your priority is Intelligent workflow automation and security platform for AI agents and apps., Tines is the optimal choice; for Visual platform for no-code workflow automation and orchestration., Make provides superior benefits.

Explore more alternatives