Workflow Automation & Backend OrchestrationLast technical review:
Markdown for AI (.md)

Activepieces vs Make

Objective factual benchmark between two leading platforms to identify optimal fit based on scale and architecture.

Technical Verdict & Decision Factors

Activepieces is an open-source automation platform supporting self-hosting and AI agents, whereas Make operates as a managed cloud solution featuring a powerful visual canvas for complex scenarios and usage-based billing.

Scale-ups & Agile Teams

Choose Activepieces if

Ideal for technical teams with strict data sovereignty requirements needing to deploy workflows and AI agents on their own infrastructure.

Get started with Activepieces (opens in a new tab)
Enterprise & Compliance

Choose Make if

Suitable for organizations preferring a fully managed iPaaS platform with advanced error handling capabilities for complex scenarios.

Get started with Make (opens in a new tab)

Key Differentiators

  • Self-hosted deployment model versus managed cloud infrastructure.
  • Team-based seat pricing versus usage-based operation consumption.
  • Native AI agent integration versus traditional integration workflows.
Weights 40% DX, 40% Fair Pricing, 20% PerformanceRecommended winner for this scenario:Activepieces (7.0/10)
Activepieces7.0/10
Make7.0/10
Weights 45% Security & Governance, 35% Reliability, 20% DXRecommended winner for this scenario:Activepieces (7.9/10)
Activepieces7.9/10
Make7.8/10
Weights 55% Data Portability, 25% Fair Pricing, 20% SecurityRecommended winner for this scenario:Activepieces (4.9/10)
Activepieces4.9/10
Make3.8/10

Side-by-Side Feature Comparison

Activepieces vs Make
Datasheet
ActivepiecesFreemium
MakeFreemium
Commercial Model & Pricing
Base PriceFree TierFree Tier
Pricing ModelFreemiumFreemium
Score4.4/5.0(1 review)4.4/5.0(1 review)
VerifiedVerifiedVerified tool: Audited technical attributesVerifiedVerified tool: Audited technical attributes
Core Features Matrix
Specific Capabilities for Workflow Automation & Backend Orchestration
Stateful Durable ExecutionNot availableNot available
Dead Letter Queue (DLQ) & ReplayNot availableNot available
TypeScript / Python Code StepsNot availableNot available
Enterprise Architecture & Security (7 Universals)
REST & GraphQL APICompatibleCompatible
SSO / SAML AuthenticationCompatibleCompatible
Self-Hosted OptionCompatibleNot available
Full Data ExportCompatibleCompatible
Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)CompatibleCompatible
Custom Domains & SSLCompatibleNot available
Immutable Audit LogsCompatibleCompatible
Architecture & Verified Specs
Compliance & Data Sovereignty
Audited Certifications
SOC2 TYPE2GDPR
SOC2 TYPE2GDPR
SSO (SAML) AvailabilityEnterprise plan onlyEnterprise plan only
Legal Headquarters & JurisdictionUSCZ
Subject to US CLOUD ActSubject (US Extraterritorial)Immune (EU Sovereignty)
Data ResidencyUS, EU, SELF_HOSTEDUS, EU
Open Source Telemetry & Code Sovereignty
GitHub Stars 25.3kProprietary / Closed Source
Latest Commit / VitalityNov 2, 2026Proprietary / Closed Source
SPDX LicenseOtherProprietary / Closed Source
Primary LanguageTypeScriptCloud / SaaS
Minimum RAM RequiredCloud ManagedCloud Managed
Visit WebsiteTry Activepieces (opens in a new tab)Try Make (opens in a new tab)

Last technical review:

Technical Scorecard Comparison
Show detailsHide details

Technical Scorecard Comparison: Activepieces vs Make

Activepieces86/100
Make85/100
DX & Tech Documentation+2 pts Activepieces
Activepieces
90
Make
88
Pricing Fairness+3 pts Activepieces
Activepieces
85
Make
82
Security & Governance+3 pts Make
Activepieces
82
Make
85
Data Portability & Sovereignty+8 pts Activepieces
Activepieces
88
Make
80
Performance & Reliability+5 pts Make
Activepieces
85
Make
90

Time to Value & Fit by Segment: Activepieces vs Make

Activepieces

Time-to-Value:< 1 hour (Immediate)
Curve:Moderate (Standard)

Near-instantaneous deployment with minimal technical friction.

Make

Time-to-Value:< 1 hour (Immediate)
Curve:Moderate (Standard)

Near-instantaneous deployment with minimal technical friction.

Segment Fit Comparison

Startup & Agile Teams1 to 50 members
Activepieces
9%
Make
90%
Mid-Market & Scaleup50 to 500 members
Activepieces
8%
Make
85%
Corporate Enterprise500+ members
Activepieces
7%
Make
75%
Pricing & Licensing Breakdown
Show detailsHide details

Billing Clauses & SSO Tax: Activepieces vs Make

Activepieces

Enterprise-Only SSO

SAML/SSO locked strictly behind the highest custom corporate tier.

Free:Includes access to community editions and self-hosting with basic workflow allowances.
  • Task execution limits can scale quickly with high-frequency workflows.
  • Advanced governance features may require enterprise tier commitments.

Make

Enterprise-Only SSO

SAML/SSO locked strictly behind the highest custom corporate tier.

Free:Includes a limited monthly operations quota for testing and basic workflows.
  • Operations count can increase exponentially with poorly optimized loops and iterations.
TCO & Savings CalculatorTCO 1-3Y
Show detailsHide details
Indie / Solo (1 active user)

Solo developer or independent technical founder.

Activepieces

Base Monthly Cost:$35/month
12-Month Investment:$357/year
36 Months (3 years):$1,071

Make

Most Cost-Effective
Base Monthly Cost:$12/month
12-Month Investment:$122/year
36 Months (3 years):$366
Estimated Financial Differential

Make: $235 USD/year ($705 USD 36 Months (3 years)).

Startup (10 active users)

Agile engineering team in validation and early traction stage.

Activepieces

Base Monthly Cost:$500/month
12-Month Investment:$5,100/year
36 Months (3 years):$15,300

Make

Most Cost-Effective
Base Monthly Cost:$270/month
12-Month Investment:$2,754/year
36 Months (3 years):$8,262
Estimated Financial Differential

Make: $2,346 USD/year ($7,038 USD 36 Months (3 years)).

Growth (25 active users)

Scaling company with team governance and granular access control requirements.

Activepieces

Base Monthly Cost:$1,250/month
12-Month Investment:$12,750/year
36 Months (3 years):$38,250

Make

Most Cost-Effective
Base Monthly Cost:$675/month
12-Month Investment:$6,885/year
36 Months (3 years):$20,655
Estimated Financial Differential

Make: $5,865 USD/year ($17,595 USD 36 Months (3 years)).

Scaleup (100 active users)

Established organization with enterprise security policies and mandatory SAML/SSO.

Activepieces

Base Monthly Cost:$5,000/month
12-Month Investment:$51,000/year
36 Months (3 years):$153,000

Make

Most Cost-Effective
Base Monthly Cost:$2,700/month
12-Month Investment:$27,540/year
36 Months (3 years):$82,620
Estimated Financial Differential

Make: $23,460 USD/year ($70,380 USD 36 Months (3 years)).

Usage Billing PredictabilityWhat usage costs as you scale
Show detailsHide details

Prototype / MVP (10 GB)

Comparative projection for Storage & Compute (GB)

Activepieces

Overage penalty:+$1/mo
Estimated Monthly Invoice:$36/mo
Low Risk

Make

Most Cost-Effective
Overage penalty:+$1/mo
Estimated Monthly Invoice:$21/mo
Low Risk

Base Production (50 GB)

Comparative projection for Storage & Compute (GB)

Activepieces

Overage penalty:+$8/mo
Estimated Monthly Invoice:$43/mo
Low Risk

Make

Most Cost-Effective
Overage penalty:+$8/mo
Estimated Monthly Invoice:$28/mo
Low Risk

Active Growth (250 GB)

Comparative projection for Storage & Compute (GB)

Activepieces

Overage penalty:+$44/mo
Estimated Monthly Invoice:$79/mo
Moderate Risk

Make

Most Cost-Effective
Overage penalty:+$44/mo
Estimated Monthly Invoice:$64/mo
High Risk

Large Scale (1.000 GB (1 TB))

Comparative projection for Storage & Compute (GB)

Activepieces

Overage penalty:+$179/mo
Estimated Monthly Invoice:$214/mo
Critical Risk

Make

Most Cost-Effective
Overage penalty:+$179/mo
Estimated Monthly Invoice:$199/mo
Critical Risk
Bidirectional Migration Friction Index (MFI)
Show detailsHide details

Bidirectional Migration Friction Index (MFI)

ActivepiecesMake
Smooth Migration

Migration friction: Activepieces to Make

0/100

Agile transition with low operational risk and native export/API support.

Critical Factors Evaluated

Smooth path: native export support, ingestion API, and authentication parity.

MakeActivepieces
Smooth Migration

Migration friction: Make to Activepieces

0/100

Agile transition with low operational risk and native export/API support.

Critical Factors Evaluated

Smooth path: native export support, ingestion API, and authentication parity.

Migration & Portability Verdict

Migration friction is symmetric (0/100 in both directions). Both platforms exhibit comparable switching barriers in terms of data export, public APIs, and credential continuity.

Technical Transition Playbook: Activepieces to MakeCLI Runbook
4-stage execution protocol to switch dependencies with zero data loss and verifiable rollback.
Show detailsHide details
01

Data Extraction & Baseline Snapshot

Full export of Activepieces datasets in audited formats (json). Secure an immutable snapshot prior to cutover.

/api/v1/flows
02

Schema Mapping & Contract Validation

Normalize entity identifiers, timestamps, and event payloads between Activepieces APIs and destination schema in Make.

# Schema mapping & validation
npx tsx scripts/map-migration.ts --source=activepieces --target=integromat
03

Dual-Ingestion Period (Dual-Writing)

Simultaneous telemetry dispatch to Activepieces and Make for 72 hours to contrast volume, integrity, and latency without downtime.

export TELEMETRY_PRIMARY="integromat"
export TELEMETRY_SECONDARY="activepieces"
04

Decommissioning & Rollback Safety

De-instrument Activepieces SDK, archive snapshot in cold S3 storage, and confirm zero ongoing billing.

# Check decommission
curl -I "https://activepieces.com"

Architecture Decision Record for CTOs & Tech Leads

Production-ready technical document for Notion, Confluence, or Pull Requests

Select recommended tool:
ActivepiecesMake
Download ADR (.md)View Markdown
Community Sentiment & Commercial Terms
Show detailsHide details

Technical Reputation of Activepieces

87/100 Technical Trust

Frequent Praises in Production

  • Open-source model with self-hosting options on private infrastructure.
  • Extensive ecosystem of over 770 pre-built connectors for business applications.
  • Native support for creating and orchestrating artificial intelligence agents.

Reported Production Frictions

  • Moderate learning curve for advanced agent configuration and complex flows.
  • Execution and consumption limits on cloud-hosted subscription tiers.
Commercial Treatment & Vendor Lock-in:Self-Service in Dashboard

Cancellation flow is autonomous via billing portal or subscription settings.

Technical Reputation of Make

83/100 Technical Trust

Frequent Praises in Production

  • Advanced error handling capabilities compared to similar tools
  • Powerful visual canvas for complex and branching workflows
  • Extensive connector ecosystem and support for custom API calls

Reported Production Frictions

  • Moderately steep learning curve for non-technical users
  • Operation consumption can scale quickly under high-traffic scenarios
Commercial Treatment & Vendor Lock-in:Requires Sales Contact

Assisted cancellation requiring meeting with account team or contract notice period.

Frequently Asked Questions: Activepieces vs Make

What are the key differences between Activepieces and Make?

Activepieces is an open-source automation platform supporting self-hosting and AI agents, whereas Make operates as a managed cloud solution featuring a powerful visual canvas for complex scenarios and usage-based billing.

How do Activepieces and Make pricing compare?

Activepieces starts at 0.00/mo under freemium tier, while Make starts at 0.00/mo with freemium billing.

When should you choose Activepieces over Make?

If your priority is Open-source workflow automation and AI agent platform., Activepieces is the optimal choice; for Visual platform for no-code workflow automation and orchestration., Make provides superior benefits.

Explore more alternatives

Alternatives to ActivepiecesAlternatives to Make