Raygun
PaidApplication monitoring and error tracking platform for web and mobile software.
Raygun vs Sentry
Objective factual benchmark between two leading platforms to identify optimal fit based on scale and architecture.
From $60/mo
Sentry
FreemiumApplication performance monitoring and error tracking platform for development teams.
Technical Verdict & Decision Factors
Raygun and Sentry provide error and performance monitoring, differing in distribution models and SDK scope. Sentry operates on a freemium model with a consolidated open-source ecosystem and broad multi-platform support. Raygun focuses exclusively on managed SaaS, integrating detailed RUM analytics and AI automation, while lacking a permanent free tier.
Scale-ups & Agile Teams
Choose Raygun if
Ideal for teams seeking a managed SaaS solution with integrated Real User Monitoring (RUM) without self-hosting overhead. Not suitable for tight budgets requiring a permanent free tier.
Get started with Raygun (opens in a new tab)Enterprise & Compliance
Choose Sentry if
Suitable for development teams requiring an open ecosystem, massive language support, standard SDKs, and a free tier for prototyping. Restricted by unpredictable cost scaling if event volumes exceed limits.
Get started with Sentry (opens in a new tab)Key Differentiators
- Licensing model: Freemium with open SDKs in Sentry versus purely commercial SaaS in Raygun.
- OpenTelemetry depth and ecosystem: Sentry maintains active Python development and native tracing support.
- Cost structure: Consumption-based billing with a free tier in Sentry versus paid entry plans in Raygun.
Raygun7.7/10
Sentry7.2/10
Raygun7.8/10
Sentry9.0/10
Raygun4.3/10
Sentry5.3/10
Side-by-Side Feature Comparison
| Datasheet | RaygunPaid | SentryFreemium |
|---|
Commercial Model & Pricing
| Base Price | $60.00/mo | Free Tier |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | Paid | Freemium |
| Score | ||
| Verified | VerifiedVerified tool: Audited technical attributes | VerifiedVerified tool: Audited technical attributes |
Core Features Matrix
| Specific Capabilities for Error Monitoring & APM | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ingesta OpenTelemetry (OTLP) | Not available | Not available |
| Source Map Deobfuscation | Not available | Not available |
| Built-in Session Replay | Not available | Not available |
| Direct SQL/ClickHouse Export | Not available | Not available |
| Enterprise Architecture & Security (7 Universals) | ||
| REST & GraphQL API | Compatible | Compatible |
| SSO / SAML Authentication | Compatible | Compatible |
| Self-Hosted Option | Not available | Compatible |
| Full Data Export | Compatible | Compatible |
| Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) | Compatible | Compatible |
| Custom Domains & SSL | Not available | Not available |
| Immutable Audit Logs | Compatible | Compatible |
Architecture & Verified Specs
| Compliance & Data Sovereignty | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audited Certifications | ||
| SSO (SAML) Availability | Enterprise plan only | Enterprise plan only |
| Legal Headquarters & Jurisdiction | NZ | US |
| Subject to US CLOUD Act | Immune (EU Sovereignty) | Subject (US Extraterritorial) |
| Data Residency | US, EU | US, EU |
| Open Source Telemetry & Code Sovereignty | ||
| GitHub Stars | Proprietary / Closed Source | 2.2k |
| Latest Commit / Vitality | Proprietary / Closed Source | Oct 27, 2026 |
| SPDX License | Proprietary / Closed Source | MIT |
| Primary Language | Cloud / SaaS | Python |
| Minimum RAM Required | Cloud Managed | Cloud Managed |
| Visit Website | Try Raygun (opens in a new tab) | Try Sentry (opens in a new tab) |
|---|
Last technical review:
Technical Scorecard ComparisonShow detailsHide details
Technical Scorecard Comparison
Technical Scorecard Comparison: Raygun vs Sentry
Raygun84/100
Sentry91/100
DX & Tech Documentation+10 pts Sentry
Pricing Fairness+7 pts Sentry
Security & Governance+2 pts Sentry
Data Portability & Sovereignty+8 pts Sentry
Performance & Reliability+8 pts Sentry
Time to Value & Fit by Segment: Raygun vs Sentry
Raygun
Time-to-Value:< 1 hour (Immediate)
Curve:Moderate (Standard)
Near-instantaneous deployment with minimal technical friction.
Sentry
Time-to-Value:< 1 hour (Immediate)
Curve:Low (Intuitive)
Near-instantaneous deployment with minimal technical friction.
Segment Fit Comparison
Pricing & Licensing BreakdownShow detailsHide details
Pricing & Licensing Breakdown
Billing Clauses & SSO Tax: Raygun vs Sentry
Raygun
Enterprise-Only SSO
SAML/SSO locked strictly behind the highest custom corporate tier.
- Costs scale directly with error volume spikes, which can lead to unexpected charges during incident surges.
Sentry
Enterprise-Only SSO
SAML/SSO locked strictly behind the highest custom corporate tier.
Free:Free tier includes basic error and performance monitoring with monthly event limits.
- Unexpected billing spikes can occur if error sampling or rate limiting is misconfigured during traffic surges.
TCO & Savings CalculatorTCO 1-3YShow detailsHide details
TCO & Savings CalculatorTCO 1-3Y
Usage Billing PredictabilityWhat usage costs as you scaleShow detailsHide details
Usage Billing PredictabilityWhat usage costs as you scale
Bidirectional Migration Friction Index (MFI)Show detailsHide details
Bidirectional Migration Friction Index (MFI)
Bidirectional Migration Friction Index (MFI)
Migration friction: Raygun to Sentry
0/100
Agile transition with low operational risk and native export/API support.
Critical Factors Evaluated
Smooth path: native export support, ingestion API, and authentication parity.
Migration friction: Sentry to Raygun
15/100
Agile transition with low operational risk and native export/API support.
Critical Factors Evaluated
- +15 ptsTransition from a free or freemium model to a mandatory paid tier in Raygun.
Technical Transition Playbook: Raygun to SentryCLI Runbook4-stage execution protocol to switch dependencies with zero data loss and verifiable rollback.Show detailsHide details
Technical Transition Playbook: Raygun to SentryCLI Runbook
4-stage execution protocol to switch dependencies with zero data loss and verifiable rollback.Community Sentiment & Commercial TermsShow detailsHide details
Community Sentiment & Commercial Terms
Technical Reputation of Raygun
82/100 Technical Trust
Frequent Praises in Production
- Detailed error detection and diagnosis with stack trace context
- Real User Monitoring (RUM) for web and mobile applications
- Integration with language models to suggest automated fixes
Reported Production Frictions
- Lacks a permanent free tier for indefinite usage
- Costs scale significantly based on error and event volume
Technical Reputation of Sentry
88/100 Technical Trust
Frequent Praises in Production
- Quick integration via SDKs with minimal setup across multiple languages.
- Detailed error context capture including stack traces and local variables.
- Wide ecosystem of integrations with version control and messaging tools.
Reported Production Frictions
- Event volume costs can scale rapidly if appropriate sampling filters are not configured.
- Managing and maintaining a self-hosted installation requires considerable infrastructure.
Frequently Asked Questions: Raygun vs Sentry
What are the key differences between Raygun and Sentry?
Raygun and Sentry provide error and performance monitoring, differing in distribution models and SDK scope. Sentry operates on a freemium model with a consolidated open-source ecosystem and broad multi-platform support. Raygun focuses exclusively on managed SaaS, integrating detailed RUM analytics and AI automation, while lacking a permanent free tier.
How do Raygun and Sentry pricing compare?
Raygun starts at 60.00/mo under paid tier, while Sentry starts at 0.00/mo with freemium billing.
When should you choose Raygun over Sentry?
If your priority is Application monitoring and error tracking platform for web and mobile software., Raygun is the optimal choice; for Application performance monitoring and error tracking platform for development teams., Sentry provides superior benefits.