---
canonical: https://thejudex.com/vs/umami-vs-plausible-analytics
title: Umami vs Plausible Analytics
type: SoftwareComparison
updatedAt: 2026-10-29T06:39:48.894Z
---

# Technical Comparison: Umami vs Plausible Analytics

> Umami and Plausible Analytics are privacy-focused, cookieless web analytics solutions designed to avoid Google Analytics complexity. Umami uses TypeScript and offers web/product analytics under the MIT license for self-hosted or cloud deployments. Plausible Analytics, built in Elixir under AGPL-3.0, features a sub-1 KB tracking script and strict EU data residency.

## Capabilities and Pricing Summary

| Dimension | Umami | Plausible Analytics |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Pricing Model | FREEMIUM | PAID |
| Starting Price | Free / Contact vendor | Contact vendor |
| Technical Rating | 4.5/5.0 | 4.5/5.0 |
| Verification | Verified | Verified |
| Markdown Card | [Umami.md](https://thejudex.com/tool/umami.md) | [Plausible Analytics.md](https://thejudex.com/tool/plausible-analytics.md) |

## Key Differentiators

- Plausible's tracking script is optimized under 1 KB compared to Umami's modular implementation.
- MIT licensing in Umami for commercial flexibility versus AGPL-3.0 in Plausible.
- Tech stack based on TypeScript (Umami) versus Elixir (Plausible).
- EU data residency via Hetzner for Plausible and multi-region or self-hosted options in Umami.

## Switching Cost and Bidirectional Migration Friction (MFI)

| Migration Route | MFI Index (0-100) | Rating | Audited Critical Factors |
| :--- | :---: | :--- | :--- |
| From Umami to Plausible Analytics | 85/100 | Alto Lock-in | Umami carece de exportación masiva nativa de datos documentada, lo que incrementa el riesgo de vendor lock-in.; Plausible Analytics no expone API pública para sincronización automatizada, requiriendo importaciones manuales.; Transición de modelo gratuito o freemium a plataforma de pago obligatorio en Plausible Analytics. |
| From Plausible Analytics to Umami | 70/100 | Alto Lock-in | Plausible Analytics carece de exportación masiva nativa de datos documentada, lo que incrementa el riesgo de vendor lock-in.; Umami no expone API pública para sincronización automatizada, requiriendo importaciones manuales. |

> MFI Verdict: Migrar de Plausible Analytics a Umami presenta menor fricción operativa (70/100 frente a 85/100 en sentido inverso). Umami ofrece mayor facilidad de exportación de datos y continuidad en flujos de autenticación.

## Technical Feature Matrix

| Feature | Umami | Plausible Analytics |
| :--- | :---: | :---: |
| REST & GraphQL API | Yes | Yes |
| SSO / SAML Authentication | No | No |
| Self-Hosted Option | Yes | Yes |
| Full Data Export | Yes | Yes |
| Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) | Yes | Yes |
| Custom Domains & SSL | Yes | Yes |
| Immutable Audit Logs | No | No |

## Frequently Asked Questions

### Q: What is the main difference between Umami and Plausible Analytics?
A: Umami and Plausible Analytics are privacy-focused, cookieless web analytics solutions designed to avoid Google Analytics complexity. Umami uses TypeScript and offers web/product analytics under the MIT license for self-hosted or cloud deployments. Plausible Analytics, built in Elixir under AGPL-3.0, features a sub-1 KB tracking script and strict EU data residency.

### Q: Which is more affordable, Umami or Plausible Analytics?
A: Umami has a starting price of Free / Contact vendor, while Plausible Analytics starts from Contact vendor.

## Canonical Resources

- Web Comparison: https://thejudex.com/vs/umami-vs-plausible-analytics
- AEO Markdown Format: https://thejudex.com/vs/umami-vs-plausible-analytics.md
- Profile of Umami: https://thejudex.com/tool/umami
- Profile of Plausible Analytics: https://thejudex.com/tool/plausible-analytics