---
canonical: https://thejudex.com/vs/n8n-vs-integromat
title: n8n vs Make
type: SoftwareComparison
updatedAt: 2026-10-28T04:52:27.974Z
---

# Technical Comparison: n8n vs Make

> n8n stands out for offering self-hosted deployments and native support for custom JavaScript and Python nodes, ensuring strict data control and infrastructure sovereignty. Make operates exclusively as a cloud-based SaaS, featuring a highly sophisticated visual canvas for error handling and complex data structures without requiring proprietary infrastructure.

## Capabilities and Pricing Summary

| Dimension | n8n | Make |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Pricing Model | PAID | FREEMIUM |
| Starting Price | $24/month | Free / Contact vendor |
| Technical Rating | 4.5/5.0 | 4.4/5.0 |
| Verification | Verified | Verified |
| Markdown Card | [n8n.md](https://thejudex.com/tool/n8n.md) | [Make.md](https://thejudex.com/tool/integromat.md) |

## Key Differentiators

- Self-hosted deployment versus strictly SaaS architecture
- Custom code execution using JavaScript and Python nodes
- Licensing models and data sovereignty on proprietary servers

## Switching Cost and Bidirectional Migration Friction (MFI)

| Migration Route | MFI Index (0-100) | Rating | Audited Critical Factors |
| :--- | :---: | :--- | :--- |
| From n8n to Make | 70/100 | Alto Lock-in | n8n carece de exportación masiva nativa de datos documentada, lo que incrementa el riesgo de vendor lock-in.; Make no expone API pública para sincronización automatizada, requiriendo importaciones manuales. |
| From Make to n8n | 85/100 | Alto Lock-in | Make carece de exportación masiva nativa de datos documentada, lo que incrementa el riesgo de vendor lock-in.; n8n no expone API pública para sincronización automatizada, requiriendo importaciones manuales.; Transición de modelo gratuito o freemium a plataforma de pago obligatorio en n8n. |

> MFI Verdict: Migrar de n8n a Make presenta menor fricción operativa (70/100 frente a 85/100 en sentido inverso). La adopción de Make cuenta con menores barreras de entrada y mejor disponibilidad de ingesta.

## Technical Feature Matrix

| Feature | n8n | Make |
| :--- | :---: | :---: |
| REST & GraphQL API | Yes | Yes |
| SSO / SAML Authentication | Yes | Yes |
| Self-Hosted Option | Yes | No |
| Full Data Export | Yes | Yes |
| Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) | Yes | Yes |
| Custom Domains & SSL | No | No |
| Immutable Audit Logs | Yes | Yes |

## Frequently Asked Questions

### Q: What is the main difference between n8n and Make?
A: n8n stands out for offering self-hosted deployments and native support for custom JavaScript and Python nodes, ensuring strict data control and infrastructure sovereignty. Make operates exclusively as a cloud-based SaaS, featuring a highly sophisticated visual canvas for error handling and complex data structures without requiring proprietary infrastructure.

### Q: Which is more affordable, n8n or Make?
A: n8n has a starting price of $24/month, while Make starts from Free / Contact vendor.

## Canonical Resources

- Web Comparison: https://thejudex.com/vs/n8n-vs-integromat
- AEO Markdown Format: https://thejudex.com/vs/n8n-vs-integromat.md
- Profile of n8n: https://thejudex.com/tool/n8n
- Profile of Make: https://thejudex.com/tool/integromat